Irving Norman

To Have and Have Not, 1979

http://www.irvingnorman.com/

Irving Norman's (1906–1989) highly detailed paintings are powerful critiques of
contemporary life and times painted in the hope of promoting change. Norman believed that by pointing out the inequities, horrors, and foibles of human behavior he might somehow cause people to consider the consequences of their actions. He intended his canvases as public art, so he shunned private patronage and commercial viability. Instead, he wanted his work in public institutions, particularly museums, where “all people could come and study them and contemplate."

Norman saw everything in human terms. His paintings are monumental in scale, yet they teem with detail and are populated by swarming, clone-like figures. These figures are constricted by small urban spaces, caught in the crunch of the urban rush hour, and decimated by the pain of poverty and the horror of war. These themes manifest Norman’s perceptions of modern life and the society in which he lived, but this is relieved by the artist’s jewel-like color harmonies and sharp wit. Once the spectator is engaged, Norman’s unsettling visions cannot be ignored—or forgotten.

As a Jewish immigrant from Poland (he was born Irving Noachowitz), Norman keenly observed this country from the standpoint of an outsider. He came to the United States in 1923, living first in New York and then Los Angeles. His already tumultuous life was forever transformed in 1938 when he went to Spain to defend the Republic against the fascism of General Francisco Franco. Norman did not think he would survive the Spanish Civil War, but he ultimately returned to California. He began to express the atrocities he witnessed through drawing and then painting. In 1940, he moved to San Francisco to study at the California School of Fine Arts and later continued his studies at the Art Students League in New York. When he returned to the San Francisco Bay Area, he settled permanently in an idyllic valley south of Half Moon Bay.

Norman’s paintings, always uniquely his own, are informed by a sweeping knowledge of art history and manifest the influence of many artists and cultures. During decades dominated by abstraction, he focused carefully on detailed representational imagery and strong social messages.

Trapped, 1984

Although today Norman is still little known, his art is now attracting a wider audience. Much of his earlier obscurity stemmed in part from twenty years of surveillance by the FBI. Norman’s youthful political affiliations made him stand out in the McCarthy era, which was marked by a widespread fear—and persecution—of communists. However chilling the effect of such government scrutiny upon one man’s life, Norman’s paintings stand as testimony to his talent, his determination, and dogmatic conscience.

To be sure, Norman pulls no punches and his paintings are profound, shocking, and revealing. “He scares people. . . ,” explained San Francisco Chronicle art critic Alfred Frankenstein, “Norman’s social criticism hits below the belt.” Unmasking the realities of human nature and the contemporary society in which we live, Norman himself aimed only “to tell the truth of our time.” He harnesses colossal scale and infinite detail to make the immensity and atrocities of war and contemporary society comprehensible. While often horrific and terrifying, these visions contain a deeper message, and that is one of hope.


Human Condition, 1980

george carlin nails it

George Carlin Nails It


"The real reason that we can't have the Ten Commandments in a courthouse: You cannot post 'Thou shalt not steal,' 'Thou shalt not commit adultery,' and 'Thou shalt not lie' in a building full of lawyers, judges, and politicians. It creates a hostile work environment."- George Carlin

The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism

The Shock Doctrine

In THE SHOCK DOCTRINE, Naomi Klein explodes the myth that the global free market triumphed democratically. Exposing the thinking, the money trail and the puppet strings behind the world-changing crises and wars of the last four decades, The Shock Doctrine is the gripping story of how America’s “free market” policies have come to dominate the world-- through the exploitation of disaster-shocked people and countries.

At the most chaotic juncture in Iraq’s civil war, a new law is unveiled that would allow Shell and BP to claim the country’s vast oil reserves…. Immediately following September 11, the Bush Administration quietly out-sources the running of the “War on Terror” to Halliburton and Blackwater…. After a tsunami wipes out the coasts of Southeast Asia, the pristine beaches are auctioned off to tourist resorts.... New Orleans’s residents, scattered from Hurricane Katrina, discover that their public housing, hospitals and schools will never be reopened…. These events are examples of “the shock doctrine”: using the public’s disorientation following massive collective shocks – wars, terrorist attacks, or natural disasters -- to achieve control by imposing economic shock therapy. Sometimes, when the first two shocks don’t succeed in wiping out resistance, a third shock is employed: the electrode in the prison cell or the Taser gun on the streets.

Based on breakthrough historical research and four years of on-the-ground reporting in disaster zones, The Shock Doctrine vividly shows how disaster capitalism – the rapid-fire corporate reengineering of societies still reeling from shock – did not begin with September 11, 2001. The book traces its origins back fifty years, to the University of Chicago under Milton Friedman, which produced many of the leading neo-conservative and neo-liberal thinkers whose influence is still profound in Washington today. New, surprising connections are drawn between economic policy, “shock and awe” warfare and covert CIA-funded experiments in electroshock and sensory deprivation in the 1950s, research that helped write the torture manuals used today in Guantanamo Bay.

The Shock Doctrine follows the application of these ideas though our contemporary history, showing in riveting detail how well-known events of the recent past have been deliberate, active theatres for the shock doctrine, among them: Pinochet’s coup in Chile in 1973, the Falklands War in 1982, the Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989, the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the Asian Financial crisis in 1997 and Hurricane Mitch in 1998.